![]() When overclocked, both Phenoms are equal for all intent purposes. The X4 940 has a 8% advantage in minimum frame rates in single card results and 7% in CrossFire. The X4 940 is 4% faster in average frame rates in single card mode and 2% faster than the 720BE in CrossFire. The Phenom II X4 940 leads the group at 1920x1200 with a single card. Both Phenom II systems had extremely stable frame rates along with very fluid game play during the heavy action sequences. It was only in intensive ground scenes with numerous units that we really noticed the problem and it was primarily with the Q9550 platform. However, the hitch and pausing we encountered previously was mitigated somewhat in our new tests. Guess what, we still noticed that problem with the 9.3 drivers. Rates in the 23~24fps range on a couple of runs and then jump to theirĬurrent results or higher on the others. In our previous testing with the 8.12 drivers, the Intel systems would generate minimum frame Overclocking the 720BE resulted in a 9% improvement in average frame rates and 5% in minimum frame rates, indicating we are largely GPU limited at this point. ![]() Installing a second card for CrossFire operation improves average frame rates by 42% and minimum frame rates by 43% for the X3 720BE. ![]() When overclocked the 720BE finishes ahead ever so slightly but within our margin of error on the benchmark. X4 940 offers slight better performance than the X3 720BE in the single card and CrossFire results with a 1% advantage thanks to a higher clock speed. Single card scores at 1680x1050 are fairly close between each platform. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |